Snook & Haughey, P.C.
Aggressive and ethical representation in Central Virginia
Call Us Now
Snook and Haughey, P.C banner
  • Menu
  • Home
  • What We Do
    • Criminal Law
      • Felony Defense
      • Traffic Offenses
      • DUI
      • Juvenile Court
      • Drug Defense
      • Federal Cases
      • Crimes involving college students
      • Expungements
      • Restoration of Rights
      • Sex Offender Registry Issues
    • Family Law
      • Adoption
      • Divorce
      • Custody and Visitation
    • Personal Injury and Tort Law
      • Car accidents
      • Victim of Crime
      • Slip and fall
      • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
      • Medical Malpractice
      • Dog Bite
      • Premises Liability
    • Civil Litigation
      • Insurance litigation
      • Real estate disputes
      • Will contests
      • Construction contract disputes
      • Employment
      • Libel and slander
    • Wills and Estates
      • Wills
      • Estate Planning
      • Advance Medical Directive
      • Estate Administration
    • Appeals
      • State criminal appeals
      • Federal criminal appeals
      • Civil cases
    • Second opinions
  • About the firm
  • Our Attorneys
    • J. Lloyd Snook, III
    • Sheila C. Haughey
  • How We Charge
  • Contact Us
  • News
  • Law Firm Blogs
    • Constitutional Law
    • Criminal
    • Personal Injury Law
You are here: Home / News / McDonnell trial — Star Scientific stock was a dog

McDonnell trial — Star Scientific stock was a dog

Published by lloyd on August 9, 2014

One of the little sidebar stories in the McDonnell trial has been Maureen McDonnell’s purchases of Star Scientific stock (“STSI”). There is nothing specifically illegal associated with the purchases, but when you think about the conflict of interest issues, and about the financial acumen of the McDonnells, consider the following chronology:

June 1, 2011 — Maureen McDonnell buys 6,000 shares of Star Scientific stock at about $5 a share, for $31,079. She used $50,000 that Jonnie Williams had loaned the family to help with their crushing debt load; Jonnie later testified that he was surprised to learn that his loan had gone to buying STSI stock.
August 1, 2011 — Maureen and Jonnie Williams fly to Florida to speak to investors.
August 2, 2011 — Maureen buys another $2,000 of STSI; the stock price is about $2.20. Her initial investment of $31,079 was now worth $13,333; in two months, it had lost more than half its value. But around that time, Williams and the McDonnells were planning the August 30, 2011, “product launch” lunch in the Governor’s Mansion; presumably Maureen was confident that this would make the stock go up again.
December, 2011 — Maureen sells all the STSI stock so that it wouldn’t have to be disclosed on the Statement of Economic Interests that Bob had to complete, showing all investments as of December 31, 2011. The stock is sold at a loss of about $20,000.
January, 2012 — Maureen buys the stock back. She sold it again in late 2012, so that it would not have to be disclosed on the Statement of Economic Interests. It had lost another 25% of its value, roughly.

Here is a chart of STSI prices by quarter, taken from their 2012 Annual Report at page 27:
2012                     2011
Quarter                                                              High    Low          High    Low
First . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $4.18  $2.13         $4.19   $1.56
Second . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.96    2.66           5.35     2.97
Third . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5.05    3.21           4.60     1.50
Fourth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3.58    1.56           3.20    2.00

The stock price declined throughout 2012; its yearly low was $1.56, in December, 2012. In 2013, the price continued to decline, ending 2013 at about $1.00 per share. It is presently trading for about $.50 a share.

Reading the annual report, it is hard to see why Maureen would buy this turkey of a stock, unless she thought that she had some inside information. Or unless she believed Jonnie Williams and his claims for Anatabloc. Or unless she had some other reason to want to be a shareholder of STSI.

Posted in Criminal, News Tagged McDonnell
← Previous Next →

Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
    • Virginia Criminal Procedure, briefly
    • Hot Topics in Criminal Law
    • Felony Defense
    • Drug Defense
    • Traffic Offenses
    • DUI
    • Juvenile Court
    • Federal Cases
    • Crimes involving college students
    • Expungements
    • Restoration of Rights
    • Sex Offender Registry Issues
  • Family Law
    • Adoption
    • Divorce
    • Custody and Visitation
  • Personal Injury and Tort Law
    • Car accidents
      • Handling Car Insurance Claims
      • Health Insurance Liens
      • Contributory Negligence
      • It’s Not Really Our Fault
      • The “Six-Week” Defense
    • Slip and fall
    • Victim of Crime
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
    • Dog Bite
  • Civil Litigation
    • Insurance litigation
    • Real estate disputes
    • Will contests
    • Construction contract disputes
    • Employment
    • Libel and slander
  • Wills and Estates
    • Wills
    • Estate Planning
    • Advance Medical Directive
    • Estate Administration
  • Appeals
    • State criminal appeals
    • Federal criminal appeals
    • Civil cases
  • Second opinions

Recent Posts

The Color of Law and the History of Race Discrimination in Housing

By lloyd on January 2, 2019

Category: Constitutional Law, News

First Step Act may shorten some federal sentences

By lloyd on December 18, 2018

Category: Criminal, News

Senators Introduce Federal Anti-Lynching Bill

By lloyd on December 4, 2018

Category: Criminal, News

James Fields — Murder or Manslaughter?

By lloyd on December 2, 2018

Category: Criminal, News

Fields Jury Will See Instagram Posts About Using a Car as a Weapon

By lloyd on November 29, 2018

Category: Criminal, News

Serving Central Virginia Since 1985

This website is attorney advertising.  It is designed for general information only.  The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice.  Nothing on this website constitutes an offer to form a contract, and simply responding to this website cannot form a lawyer/client relationship.  The only way that you can become a client of Snook & Haughey, P.C., is to actually speak with a lawyer in the firm and to make an agreement with a lawyer in the firm.

We Accept

We accept Visa, Mastercard and Discover

Copyright © 2025 Snook & Haughey, P.C.
Charlottesville, Virginia

Call Us Now