Snook & Haughey, P.C.
Aggressive and ethical representation in Central Virginia
Call Us Now
Snook and Haughey, P.C banner
  • Menu
  • Home
  • What We Do
    • Criminal Law
      • Felony Defense
      • Traffic Offenses
      • DUI
      • Juvenile Court
      • Drug Defense
      • Federal Cases
      • Crimes involving college students
      • Expungements
      • Restoration of Rights
      • Sex Offender Registry Issues
    • Family Law
      • Adoption
      • Divorce
      • Custody and Visitation
    • Personal Injury and Tort Law
      • Car accidents
      • Victim of Crime
      • Slip and fall
      • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
      • Medical Malpractice
      • Dog Bite
      • Premises Liability
    • Civil Litigation
      • Insurance litigation
      • Real estate disputes
      • Will contests
      • Construction contract disputes
      • Employment
      • Libel and slander
    • Wills and Estates
      • Wills
      • Estate Planning
      • Advance Medical Directive
      • Estate Administration
    • Appeals
      • State criminal appeals
      • Federal criminal appeals
      • Civil cases
    • Second opinions
  • About the firm
  • Our Attorneys
    • J. Lloyd Snook, III
    • Sheila C. Haughey
  • How We Charge
  • Contact Us
  • News
  • Law Firm Blogs
    • Constitutional Law
    • Criminal
    • Personal Injury Law
You are here: Home / News / Child shoots child accidentally – is it a crime?

Child shoots child accidentally – is it a crime?

Published by lloyd on May 24, 2013

The saddest news in Charlottesville this week is the news that 10-year-old Maggie Hollifield was shot and killed in her home by a teenager.  The medical examiner has now concluded that the shooting was accidental. 

The local TV station asked me to comment on whether the situation would lead to court proceedings.  The facts are not entirely public, though we can infer that the shooter was a family member (perhaps Maggie’s brother).  I have also heard it said that the gun accidentally discharged while it was being cleaned.  There are four possibilities to think about:

  1. Civil proceedings — suing someone for money damages.  This wouldn’t happen, for a lot of reasons.  First, who would you sue?  Parents aren’t responsible for the negligence of their children, and even if they were, the beneficiaries of a wrongful death action would be the siblings and the parents.  They wouldn’t be suing themselves.
  2. Child protective services investigation — Any time there is an injury (much less a death) to a child, it is possible that Child Protective Services (CPS) could investigate to see if there was some kind of abuse or neglect.  Here, the allegation would no doubt be made that the parents were negligent in allowing a teenager to come into possession of a loaded gun.  This could quite possibly lead to civil abuse and neglect charges being filed against the parents.  More on that later.
  3. Criminal charges against the shooter — Consistent with the Medical Examiner’s finding that this was an accident, the Commonwealth’s Attorney could bring charges against the teenager for involuntary manslaughter or for reckless handling of a firearm.  It would depend entirely on the exact facts here — particularly on the question of a reckless discharge.  If the teenager pointed the gun at Maggie in horsing around, and it went off, that could be a reckless discharge, and it might support a manslaughter charge, but if the evidence was in fact that the teenager didn’t know that the gun was loaded and that it discharged entirely by accident, that would seem to be purely negligence and not recklessness.  If it is purely negligence, it could still be the basis for a manslaughter  charge, but at some level a prosecutor needs to ask him or herself what good would be served by bringing such a charge.  What would be accomplished by subjecting this family to more anguish?
  4. Criminal charges for child abuse and neglect.  There have been a few such charges brought in Virginia in recent years.  Just sampling the newspapers whose archives are online, we get this very recent case from Henrico County — a 10-year-old found a gun and shot a 4-year-old.  That case has not yet gone to trial, but the key question there is whether it is felony child endangerment to store a firearm in such a way that a 10-year-old could find it and play with it.  There have been other cases in the Richmond area where children playing with loaded guns have caused injury (or even killed someone) and the parent has been charged with felony child endangerment or neglect.

The cases alleging child endangerment or neglect are VERY fact-specific.  From what I know of this case so far, I doubt that a case for criminal charges will be brought.  But then, I don’t claim to know anything other than what I read in the paper.

Ultimately, the question on the criminal side is going to be whether there is a good reason to bring the case.

Posted in Criminal, News Tagged juvenile criminal law
← Previous Next →

Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
    • Virginia Criminal Procedure, briefly
    • Hot Topics in Criminal Law
    • Felony Defense
    • Drug Defense
    • Traffic Offenses
    • DUI
    • Juvenile Court
    • Federal Cases
    • Crimes involving college students
    • Expungements
    • Restoration of Rights
    • Sex Offender Registry Issues
  • Family Law
    • Adoption
    • Divorce
    • Custody and Visitation
  • Personal Injury and Tort Law
    • Car accidents
      • Handling Car Insurance Claims
      • Health Insurance Liens
      • Contributory Negligence
      • It’s Not Really Our Fault
      • The “Six-Week” Defense
    • Slip and fall
    • Victim of Crime
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
    • Dog Bite
  • Civil Litigation
    • Insurance litigation
    • Real estate disputes
    • Will contests
    • Construction contract disputes
    • Employment
    • Libel and slander
  • Wills and Estates
    • Wills
    • Estate Planning
    • Advance Medical Directive
    • Estate Administration
  • Appeals
    • State criminal appeals
    • Federal criminal appeals
    • Civil cases
  • Second opinions

Recent Posts

The Color of Law and the History of Race Discrimination in Housing

By lloyd on January 2, 2019

Category: Constitutional Law, News

First Step Act may shorten some federal sentences

By lloyd on December 18, 2018

Category: Criminal, News

Senators Introduce Federal Anti-Lynching Bill

By lloyd on December 4, 2018

Category: Criminal, News

James Fields — Murder or Manslaughter?

By lloyd on December 2, 2018

Category: Criminal, News

Fields Jury Will See Instagram Posts About Using a Car as a Weapon

By lloyd on November 29, 2018

Category: Criminal, News

Serving Central Virginia Since 1985

This website is attorney advertising.  It is designed for general information only.  The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice.  Nothing on this website constitutes an offer to form a contract, and simply responding to this website cannot form a lawyer/client relationship.  The only way that you can become a client of Snook & Haughey, P.C., is to actually speak with a lawyer in the firm and to make an agreement with a lawyer in the firm.

We Accept

We accept Visa, Mastercard and Discover

Copyright © 2025 Snook & Haughey, P.C.
Charlottesville, Virginia

Call Us Now