Snook & Haughey, P.C.
Aggressive and ethical representation in Central Virginia
Call Us Now
Snook and Haughey, P.C banner
  • Menu
  • Home
  • What We Do
    • Criminal Law
      • Felony Defense
      • Traffic Offenses
      • DUI
      • Juvenile Court
      • Drug Defense
      • Federal Cases
      • Crimes involving college students
      • Expungements
      • Restoration of Rights
      • Sex Offender Registry Issues
    • Family Law
      • Adoption
      • Divorce
      • Custody and Visitation
    • Personal Injury and Tort Law
      • Car accidents
      • Victim of Crime
      • Slip and fall
      • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
      • Medical Malpractice
      • Dog Bite
      • Premises Liability
    • Civil Litigation
      • Insurance litigation
      • Real estate disputes
      • Will contests
      • Construction contract disputes
      • Employment
      • Libel and slander
    • Wills and Estates
      • Wills
      • Estate Planning
      • Advance Medical Directive
      • Estate Administration
    • Appeals
      • State criminal appeals
      • Federal criminal appeals
      • Civil cases
    • Second opinions
  • About the firm
  • Our Attorneys
    • J. Lloyd Snook, III
    • Sheila C. Haughey
  • How We Charge
  • Contact Us
  • News
  • Law Firm Blogs
    • Constitutional Law
    • Criminal
    • Personal Injury Law
You are here: Home / News / McDonnell trial, Day 13 — the false statement charges look tenuous

McDonnell trial, Day 13 — the false statement charges look tenuous

Published by lloyd on August 14, 2014

Although the big news is the allegation of corruption in how Bob McDonnell tried to promote Star Scientific and Anatabloc, I have been thinking all along that the “sleeper” charges are Counts 12, 13 and 14.  Counts 12 and 13 deal with allegations that the McDonnells made knowingly false statements on financial statements that accompanied applications for refinancing their MoBo Realty LLC rental homes.  It often happens that when the federal government starts subpoenaing everything you own and going over it with a fine-toothed comb, little discrepancies are found.

Count 12 alleges that on October 3, 2012, Bob McDonnell made a knowingly false statement when, “as part of required paperwork for a loan on one of the MoBo Virginia Beach properties,” he failed to list $120,000 in loans from Jonnie Williams.

Count 13 alleges that on February 1, 2013, both Bob and Maureen transmitted a signed Uniform Residential Loan Application to a bank in an effort to refinance four loans, including loans on the two MoBo Virginia Beach properties, and that the application did not list loans from Jonnie Williams or the Star Scientific stock that Maureen had bought.  Two weeks later, Maureen was interviewed by the Virginia State Police, and then three days later Bob sent a fax to the loan officers that added the loans from Jonnie, the Star Scientific stock, and a few other items such as a car that had been left off the first document.

The defense responded with three themes, developed on cross examination of the government witnesses:

  • with testimony that there are often errors and omissions in initial applications, and that getting a letter or memo from the applicant some days later is not terribly unusual;
  • with testimony that if the loan was never put in writing, it might not get included just because people don’t think about it in the same way (remember, the issue is whether Bob and Maureen were trying to defraud, not whether the application was technically perfectly correct); and
  • with testimony that loans made to a separate entity such as MoBo Realty LLC, unless accompanied by personal guarantees from the owners, don’t really have to be listed on a personal financial statement.

If the indictment is correct that the documents submitted were personal financial statements (unfortunately, the news reports aren’t clear enough on a technical point),  the loans to the LLC would not have to be separated out; it would be sufficient if the net worth of the LLC was reasonably accurately disclosed.

Loan underwriters take statements of the value of closely-held LLCs as being presumptively fictional; they will usually ask for copies of the LLC tax returns so that they can look for themselves.  And it seems unlikely that Bob or Maureen would have been submitting detailed financials on MoBo Realty, because the managers of that LLC were Bob’s sister and her ex-husband.   The charges may not get thrown out by the judge, but the jury may not be very impressed with the prosecution’s proof of intent.

The final witness Wednesday was FBI Agent David Husler, who testified that the FBI interviewed more than 300 witnesses and collected and examined over 3.5 million pages of documents.  This double-edged testimony is important to the prosecution because they like to show how diligent they have been, how thorough and fair their investigation was, etc.  The defense counter will be, “300 witnesses, and no one who can say that there was a quid pro quo?  3.5 million documents and you didn’t find anything that showed that the Governor actually DID something in return for the loans?”

It appears that the prosecution will wrap up Thursday, and the jury will get the rest of the week off while the lawyers argue motions to dismiss.  The defense is expected to begin its evidence on Monday.

 

Posted in Criminal, News Tagged McDonnell
← Previous Next →

Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
    • Virginia Criminal Procedure, briefly
    • Hot Topics in Criminal Law
    • Felony Defense
    • Drug Defense
    • Traffic Offenses
    • DUI
    • Juvenile Court
    • Federal Cases
    • Crimes involving college students
    • Expungements
    • Restoration of Rights
    • Sex Offender Registry Issues
  • Family Law
    • Adoption
    • Divorce
    • Custody and Visitation
  • Personal Injury and Tort Law
    • Car accidents
      • Handling Car Insurance Claims
      • Health Insurance Liens
      • Contributory Negligence
      • It’s Not Really Our Fault
      • The “Six-Week” Defense
    • Slip and fall
    • Victim of Crime
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
    • Dog Bite
  • Civil Litigation
    • Insurance litigation
    • Real estate disputes
    • Will contests
    • Construction contract disputes
    • Employment
    • Libel and slander
  • Wills and Estates
    • Wills
    • Estate Planning
    • Advance Medical Directive
    • Estate Administration
  • Appeals
    • State criminal appeals
    • Federal criminal appeals
    • Civil cases
  • Second opinions

Recent Posts

The Color of Law and the History of Race Discrimination in Housing

By lloyd on January 2, 2019

Category: Constitutional Law, News

First Step Act may shorten some federal sentences

By lloyd on December 18, 2018

Category: Criminal, News

Senators Introduce Federal Anti-Lynching Bill

By lloyd on December 4, 2018

Category: Criminal, News

James Fields — Murder or Manslaughter?

By lloyd on December 2, 2018

Category: Criminal, News

Fields Jury Will See Instagram Posts About Using a Car as a Weapon

By lloyd on November 29, 2018

Category: Criminal, News

Serving Central Virginia Since 1985

This website is attorney advertising.  It is designed for general information only.  The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice.  Nothing on this website constitutes an offer to form a contract, and simply responding to this website cannot form a lawyer/client relationship.  The only way that you can become a client of Snook & Haughey, P.C., is to actually speak with a lawyer in the firm and to make an agreement with a lawyer in the firm.

We Accept

We accept Visa, Mastercard and Discover

Copyright © 2025 Snook & Haughey, P.C.
Charlottesville, Virginia

Call Us Now