Snook & Haughey, P.C.
Aggressive and ethical representation in Central Virginia
Call Us Now
Snook and Haughey, P.C banner
  • Menu
  • Home
  • What We Do
    • Criminal Law
      • Felony Defense
      • Traffic Offenses
      • DUI
      • Juvenile Court
      • Drug Defense
      • Federal Cases
      • Crimes involving college students
      • Expungements
      • Restoration of Rights
      • Sex Offender Registry Issues
    • Family Law
      • Adoption
      • Divorce
      • Custody and Visitation
    • Personal Injury and Tort Law
      • Car accidents
      • Victim of Crime
      • Slip and fall
      • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
      • Medical Malpractice
      • Dog Bite
      • Premises Liability
    • Civil Litigation
      • Insurance litigation
      • Real estate disputes
      • Will contests
      • Construction contract disputes
      • Employment
      • Libel and slander
    • Wills and Estates
      • Wills
      • Estate Planning
      • Advance Medical Directive
      • Estate Administration
    • Appeals
      • State criminal appeals
      • Federal criminal appeals
      • Civil cases
    • Second opinions
  • About the firm
  • Our Attorneys
    • J. Lloyd Snook, III
    • Sheila C. Haughey
  • How We Charge
  • Contact Us
  • News
  • Law Firm Blogs
    • Constitutional Law
    • Criminal
    • Personal Injury Law
You are here: Home / News / McDonnell trial, day 14 — the prosecution rests

McDonnell trial, day 14 — the prosecution rests

Published by lloyd on August 14, 2014

As expected, the government rested today, using FBI Special Agent David Hulser to wrap everything up in a nice, neat little bow.

The prosecution hopes that people will remember the $36,000 Cape Cod weekend for the McDonnell family in September, 2012.  $150 cognac shots and $1,309 for lobster and salmon are going to stick in the craw of the jury.  And the logical question is going to be, “Just why did you think Jonnie Williams was paying for lobster and salmon and cognac for the whole family?  Did you really think he just liked you and your family?”

The defense hopes that people will remember that out of all of the thousands of e-mails and texts and phone calls that the government traced, there were no calls or texts to the University of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University or the Tobacco Commission from Bob McDonnell.

The prosecution picture is of Bob McDonnell with no sense of propriety, no control over his finances or over his family.  (Remember, this trial is taking place in Richmond, where we still refer to that business with Mr. Lincoln as “the recent unpleasantness.”  Propriety is a big thing in Richmond, and in Virginia.)

The defense picture is that Bob McDonnell played Jonnie Williams for a sucker, but that’s not what he’s charged with.

Tomorrow will be spent arguing motions to dismiss — the McDonnell attorneys will argue that there is no evidence, or no credible evidence, that Bob McDonnell ever agreed to do something official that he shouldn’t have agreed to do in return for gifts and loans.  It is possible that Judge Spencer may dismiss the counts that basically sound like extortion charges, though the usual pattern is to take such motions under advisement until later and rule on them at the end of the entire case.

Then Monday begins the defense evidence.

Posted in Criminal, News Tagged McDonnell
← Previous Next →

Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
    • Virginia Criminal Procedure, briefly
    • Hot Topics in Criminal Law
    • Felony Defense
    • Drug Defense
    • Traffic Offenses
    • DUI
    • Juvenile Court
    • Federal Cases
    • Crimes involving college students
    • Expungements
    • Restoration of Rights
    • Sex Offender Registry Issues
  • Family Law
    • Adoption
    • Divorce
    • Custody and Visitation
  • Personal Injury and Tort Law
    • Car accidents
      • Handling Car Insurance Claims
      • Health Insurance Liens
      • Contributory Negligence
      • It’s Not Really Our Fault
      • The “Six-Week” Defense
    • Slip and fall
    • Victim of Crime
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
    • Dog Bite
  • Civil Litigation
    • Insurance litigation
    • Real estate disputes
    • Will contests
    • Construction contract disputes
    • Employment
    • Libel and slander
  • Wills and Estates
    • Wills
    • Estate Planning
    • Advance Medical Directive
    • Estate Administration
  • Appeals
    • State criminal appeals
    • Federal criminal appeals
    • Civil cases
  • Second opinions

Recent Posts

The Color of Law and the History of Race Discrimination in Housing

By lloyd on January 2, 2019

Category: Constitutional Law, News

First Step Act may shorten some federal sentences

By lloyd on December 18, 2018

Category: Criminal, News

Senators Introduce Federal Anti-Lynching Bill

By lloyd on December 4, 2018

Category: Criminal, News

James Fields — Murder or Manslaughter?

By lloyd on December 2, 2018

Category: Criminal, News

Fields Jury Will See Instagram Posts About Using a Car as a Weapon

By lloyd on November 29, 2018

Category: Criminal, News

Serving Central Virginia Since 1985

This website is attorney advertising.  It is designed for general information only.  The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice.  Nothing on this website constitutes an offer to form a contract, and simply responding to this website cannot form a lawyer/client relationship.  The only way that you can become a client of Snook & Haughey, P.C., is to actually speak with a lawyer in the firm and to make an agreement with a lawyer in the firm.

We Accept

We accept Visa, Mastercard and Discover

Copyright © 2025 Snook & Haughey, P.C.
Charlottesville, Virginia

Call Us Now